David Talbot thinks we need it.
Meanwhile there's this:
Wall Street and the United Nations Oct. 1.
CNN, NPR, Hello? New York Times? Hello, anybody there?
...<crickets>
David Talbot thinks we need it.
Meanwhile there's this:
Wall Street and the United Nations Oct. 1.
CNN, NPR, Hello? New York Times? Hello, anybody there?
...<crickets>
Last edited by James; 09-28-2011 at 09:04 PM.
“I understand that I will be made to suffer for my actions, but I will be satisfied if the federation of secret law, unequal pardon and irresistible executive powers that rule the world that I love are revealed even for an instant.”--Edward Snowden
huh. just cancelled my Salon subscription this week because they had such lame articles. oh but now, now they're gonna be serious.
perhaps as folks are forced to depend on locally made and traded goods and services due to the endless economic collapses, the corporate overlords will be easy to dislodge?
I was reading yesterday that NYT has yet to publish an article on the Wall Street demonstrations. Maybe a list of what "news" organizations in the US, that are not reporting the news, is in order.
Not exactly.
~m.
When you do things right. people won't be sure that you've done anything at all.
![]()
A single sticker might've conveyed a message about George Bush. A dozen-and-a-half just conveys a message about the driver.
...and therein lies the problem with modern leftist protest. Participants seem more intent on asserting their 'individuality' than on delivering a concise message designed to garner broad support. For all the misspelled signs and other things that have been popular to ridicule, the Tea Party gang has been far more successful at delivering their message. Most recent left-leaning demonstrations I've seen have been, like the one described in the NYT article, mostly incomprehensible.
D. IS one of the best when it comes tracking this sort of issue! You lucky girl....![]()